If a patient told his/her physician that he/she could not tolerate seafood, the physician told him/her that he/she was allergic to iodine.
Adverse reactions to radiographic contrast media and other iodine-containing drugs were blamed on iodine. physicians were educated early in their medical career to believe that inorganic non-radioactive forms of iodine were toxic. The bioavailable iodide from iodized salt is only 10% and the daily amount of iodide absorbed from iodized salt is 200 to 500 times less than the amount of iodine/iodide previously recommended by U.S. During the second half of the 20 th century, iodophobic misinformation disseminated progressively and deceitfully among the medical profession resulted in a decreased use of Lugol, with iodized salt becoming the standard for iodine supplementation (1). The recommended daily intake for iodine supplementation was 2 to 6 minims (drops) containing 12.5 to 37.5 mg elemental iodine. The minimum dose called minim, was one drop containing 6.25 mg of elemental iodine, with 40% iodine and 60% iodide as the potassium salt. In the old pharmacopeias, Lugol solution was called Liquor Iodi Compositus. physician used Lugol solution for iodine supplementation in his/her practice for both hypo- and hyperthyroidism (1), and for many other medical conditions (2).
This range of daily intake of iodine is called orthoiodosupplementation because it is the amount of iodine required for whole body sufficiency based on an iodine/iodide loading test recently developed by the author (1).ĭuring the first half of the 20 th century, almost every U.S.
#Jay abraham wikipedia update
The goal of this manuscript is to have, under the same cover, an update on the Iodine Project which started five years ago an exposé of the Wolff-Chaikoff forgery and contributions from two clinicians with a combined experience with 4,000 patients using Lugol tablets within the range recommended by pre-World War II physicians. Peter and St.The Historical Background of the Iodine Project Rembrandt ke painting ke suchi ImageĬhrist Driving the Moneychangers from the Templeĭavid with the Head of Goliath before Saul "beweechgelickhijt" sabd ke matlab "emotion" nai to "motive" bhi hae. Huyghens ke lage ek chitthi me, Rembrandt ii batae ke kosis karis ki uu art se kon chij achieve kare maangat rahaa. : the greatest and most natural movement, jiske de meeste en de natuurlijkste beweegelijkheid me se translate karaa gais hae. The painting is still missing after robbery from the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in 1990. ĭuuno painting aur printmaking me uu classical iconography ke gyan dekhais hae, jiske mold kar ke appan requiements ke fit karis hae jaise ki uske Bible me ke scene ke chhapa uske Bble ke baare ke jaankari dekhae hae. Uske self-portraits ek unique aur intimate biography de hae, jisme artist ke binaa vanity ke survey karaa jaawe hae puura sachhai se. Rembrandt ke sab se barraa creative triumphs ke example hae uske portrait aapan contemporaries ke, self-portraits aur Bible ke kuchh scene ke chapa. Fir bhi uske etchings aur paintings uske jindagi bhar famous rahaa aur uske artist ke reputation achchha rahaa., aur biis saal talak uu sab khaas Dutch painter ke sikhais. Jab ki uu aapan jawani me ek portrait painter ke rup me safalta paais, uske baad e din personal tragedy aur financial hardship se bharaa rahaa. Ii uu time ke rahaa jiske the Dutch Golden Age bola jaawa rahaa. Uske Europe ke aur jaada kar ke Netherlands ke itihaas me ab se jaada important painter jaana jaawe hae. Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn ( 15 July 1606 – 4 October 1669) Netherlands ke ek jaana maana painter aur artist rahaa.